Re: UCSPI httpd?

From: fREW Schmidt <frew_at_afoolishmanifesto.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:05:10 -0800

Sadly neither of these support arbitrary http headers, which I need

-- 
sent from a rotary phone, pardon my brevity
On Jan 23, 2016 2:58 PM, "Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervision_at_skarnet.org>
wrote:
> On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote:
>
>> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that
>> context:
>>
>
>  I wouldn't recommend fnord. I have used it too, successfully too.
> But the code is not nice: little attention to error management, for
> instance. And fnord is also responsible for the only security breach
> I've had on skarnet.org in 15 years.
>  I like what Fefe does, I don't like how he does it.
>
> --
>  Laurent
>
>

Received on Sat Jan 23 2016 - 23:05:10 UTC