On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote:
> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that
> context:
I wouldn't recommend fnord. I have used it too, successfully too.
But the code is not nice: little attention to error management, for
instance. And fnord is also responsible for the only security breach
I've had on skarnet.org in 15 years.
I like what Fefe does, I don't like how he does it.
--
Laurent
Received on Sat Jan 23 2016 - 22:58:09 UTC