Re: UCSPI httpd?

From: fREW Schmidt <frioux_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:06:54 -0800

Sorry to be clear I mean request headers.

-- 
sent from a rotary phone, pardon my brevity
On Jan 23, 2016 3:05 PM, "fREW Schmidt" <frew_at_afoolishmanifesto.com> wrote:
> Sadly neither of these support arbitrary http headers, which I need
>
> --
> sent from a rotary phone, pardon my brevity
> On Jan 23, 2016 2:58 PM, "Laurent Bercot" <ska-supervision_at_skarnet.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote:
>>
>>> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that
>>> context:
>>>
>>
>>  I wouldn't recommend fnord. I have used it too, successfully too.
>> But the code is not nice: little attention to error management, for
>> instance. And fnord is also responsible for the only security breach
>> I've had on skarnet.org in 15 years.
>>  I like what Fefe does, I don't like how he does it.
>>
>> --
>>  Laurent
>>
>>

Received on Sat Jan 23 2016 - 23:06:54 UTC