Re[4]: s6-frontend & new s6-rc questions

From: Laurent Bercot <ska-supervision_at_skarnet.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:24:06 +0000

>> You could argue that there should be a separate flag in the service
>> state saying "not explicitly wanted, just currently up because of
>> dependencies", and that might be a good thing, but the current s6-rc
>> core does not support that.
>
>This is what I thought usable meant after reading the documentation.

  That's valuable feedback, thanks. I updated the documentation, can
you please confirm that
https://www.skarnet.org/software/s6-rc/repodefs.html#rx is clearer now?


>else /* actually perform the state transition... I think */

  Yes, that's what it does πŸ˜„


>After reading it again, I realize that I originally got that wrong and
>it really is "if it is a transition to the down state, this service is
>marked as essential, and GOLB_HIDEESSENTIALS is *not* set β€”it is for
>-Dβ€”, *don't* stop this service" πŸ˜…

  Exactly. The joys of double negations!

--
  Laurent
Received on Wed Feb 11 2026 - 09:24:06 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Feb 11 2026 - 09:24:40 CET