On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Avery Payne <avery.p.payne_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Alternatively, are there general-purpose practices for breaking this kind
>> of dependency?
>>
> Strange as it sounds, renaming the child definition of a dependency chain
> (which typically translates into the directory name of the defintion) seems
> to be a regular issue. Changing the name of the definition typically
> causes various "links" to break, causing the parent service to be unable to
> locate its children by name at start-up.
>
Ah, I just realized you misunderstood me. You understood "breaking
dependencies" to mean "the dependant system no longer works" where what I
meant was "the dependency is no longer relevant".
Received on Tue Apr 21 2015 - 22:08:52 UTC