Re: [s6][Feature request] Manual s6-supervise and/or s6-svscan USR1/2 re-scan signal support

From: toki clover <tokiclover_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 20:35:41 +0200

2015-04-04 13:16 GMT+02:00 Laurent Bercot <ska-supervision_at_skarnet.org>:

> On 04/04/2015 12:19, toki clover wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> or allow a signal to trigger scan, so [s6-]svscan would launch/kill child
>> supervisor processes as needed--cheap way, isn't it?
>> [...]
>>
>
> Hi Toki,
> I don't quite understand what you are suggesting. Can you please
> reformulate ?
> In particular, can you explain why "s6-svscanctl -an" isn't doing
> what you want ?
>
>
So no feature request then... I missed the -[az] last time I've checked
s6-svscanctl(8)
although I do remember the nuke variant -[Nn].

I will check later some old info about a re-scan signal for runit... and
would then
include *hard* style deps in the next supervision scripts framework release.
It would normally be cheap and simple if everything goes as intended.

Thanks for the quick reply.
Received on Sat Apr 04 2015 - 18:35:41 UTC