RE: runit-for-lfs at GoogleCode

From: James Powell <james4591_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:58:28 -0700

Yes but with sysv you had options if you chose to which made it work like daemontools, perp, etc. Plus our approach is one of adding choice to UNIX on the whole, not trying to block efforts or make egotistical claims.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Charlie Brady<mailto:charlieb-supervision_at_budge.apana.org.au>
Sent: ‎7/‎29/‎2014 3:37 PM
To: James Powell<mailto:james4591_at_hotmail.com>
Cc: supervision_at_list.skarnet.org<mailto:supervision_at_list.skarnet.org>
Subject: Re: runit-for-lfs at GoogleCode


On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, James Powell wrote:

> A replacement is something to replace a faulty or broken part. Sysvinit,
> in our any many others' opinions, was not broken.

Seriously? Start something, often something crucial to the running of the
system, and just *hope* that it runs forever? Wow!
Received on Tue Jul 29 2014 - 23:58:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:18 UTC