Re: On possibly "finer" dependencies in s6-rc

From: Casper Ti. Vector <caspervector_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 01:57:58 +0800

Well, I found this to be fairly over-simplified. If all members of the
disjunction are longruns, using s6-svwait is OK; however this is not
directly extensible to oneshots and bundles. Nevertheless, I think the
idea of using a separate command to wait for the disjunction is still
architecturally promising: no change in the s6-rc *command*, just one
more internal command in the s6-rc *suite*; and as with s6-svwait, we
can inspect the procedure of state transition by simply listing the
processes.

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:33:56AM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> perhaps no change is need after all in s6-rc.

-- 
My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C
Received on Tue May 02 2017 - 17:57:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC