Re: Naming of execlineb

From: Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:34:46 +0000

>I believe the original execline didn't support blocks; then the block
>syntax was added as execlineb; and then it turned out that block
>support is
>so useful that having the old version of execline around was pointless.

  Indeed.
  https://www.mail-archive.com/skaware_at_list.skarnet.org/msg00867.html

--
  Laurent
Received on Fri Jul 27 2018 - 21:34:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC